Xarelto (rivaroxaban), a new blood-thinning medication, has recently been approved to prevent stroke in people with atrial fibrillation, but questions remain about its safety and effectiveness. Unlike warfarin, which can be reversed with Vitamin K, Xarelto has no quick reversal agent. In an emergency, it may be difficult for doctors to stop bleeding.
What You Can Do & How We Can Help
The Schmidt Firm, LLP is currently accepting Xarelto induced injury cases in all 50 states. If you or somebody you know has been injured by Xarelto, you should contact our lawyers immediately for a free case consultation. Please use the form below to contact our Defective Drug Litigation Group or call toll free 24 hours a day at (866) 920-0753.
UPDATE: Xarelto Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed in New York
June 26, 2014 — A lawsuit (PDF) has been filed on behalf of a man who took Xarelto for atrial fibrillation and died six month later from uncontrollable bleeding in the brain (subdural hemorrhage). Click here to read more.
June 17, 2014 – The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, a newspaper in Germany, cited company sources as saying there were fewer than 10 lawsuits pending against Bayer. Bayer declined to comment except to say that Xarelto’s safety profile is consistent with clinical trials involving more than 75,000 patients. Click here to read more.
May 7, 2014 – A wrongful death lawsuit has been filed in Pennsylvania on behalf of a woman who died after taking Xarelto. Click here to read more.
November 25, 2013 – Study links Xarelto to a 3-fold increased risk of bleeding for acutely ill patients and a 4-fold increased risk of major bleeding in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Click here to read more.
October 4, 2013 – Der Spiegel has reported that Xarelto has been linked to 968 adverse events (including 72 deaths) during the first 8 months of 2013. In 2012, Xarelto was associated with 750 adverse events, including 58 deaths.
September 28, 2012 – A new study has found that Pradaxa bleeding risks offset any health benefit compared to a placebo. The study found no improvement in survival rates. Click here to read more.
What’s the problem?
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Xarelto in July 2011 for a small pool of people — those who had knee or hip replacement surgery — because they are at a higher risk of developing blood clots that could lead to a stroke or pulmonary embolism.
It was anticipated that the FDA would approve Xarelto for much broader clot-prevention use, and in November 2011, Xarelto was approved to prevent stroke in people with abnormal heart rhythm, also known as non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation is caused by an irregular heartbeat rhythm between the upper and lower chambers of the heart, which can cause blood to pool in the upper chambers. If this pooled blood forms a clot, the heart could pump it to the brain, which could block the blood vessel and cause a stroke.
More than 2 million Americans have abnormal heart rhythm and would potentially buy a drug like Xarelto, which can prevent blood clots and strokes caused by abnormal heart rhythm. Widespread use of Xarelto in this population could mean billions in profit for the drug-maker. But there is concern over the safety and efficacy of Xarelto.
Xarelto “ROCKET” Safety Study
The biggest clinical trial of Xarelto evaluated more than 14,000 patients, and compared Xarelto to warfarin. The study found that Xarelto was no more effective than warfarin, and the risks were comparable. The most common side effect was bleeding, with rates comparable to warfarin. It caused less bleeding in the brain and more bleeding in the stomach and intestines.
The safety and effectiveness of Xarelto has been questioned, after an editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine found that the use of multiple statistical analyses “muddied the waters” when it came to determining the drug’s safety.
One of the three FDA reviewers who examined the data found that the drug-makers failed to administer warfarin in an optimal way, which may have skewed the data.
Furthermore, FDA staff recommended against approving Xarelto for use in patients with atrial fibrillation, because the results of the ROCKET study do not clearly demonstrate the safety or effectiveness of the medication compared with warfarin. The reviewers recommended that an additional study is needed to clarify potential stroke and bleeding risks.
Percentage of Xarelto Patients Who Experience Bleeding
The safety of Xarelto compared to warfarin was established in the ROCKET AF clinical trial, which involved over 7,000 people. Researchers found the following rates of internal bleeding:
- Major bleeding: Xarelto (5.6%) – Warfarin (5.4%)
- Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding: Xarelto (3.1%) – Warfarin (2%)
- Bleeding in a critical organ: Xarelto (1.3%) – Warfarin (1.9%)
- Fatal bleeding: Xarelto (0.4%) – Warfarin (0.8%)
- Bleeding resulting in transfusion: Xarelto (2.6%) – Warfarin (2.1%)
Xarelto was also linked to cases of cerebral hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain), but the risk was found to be significantly lower than patients on warfarin.
Higher Bleeding Risk Seen in Xarelto Patients with Acute Illnesses
In April 2011, a study of more than 8,000 people compared Xarelto to Lovenox in patients hospitalized for acute medical conditions, such as heart failure, infectious disease, and breathing difficulty.
Lovenox is typically given as an injection to prevent blood clots, usually for no more than two weeks. The study compared Xarelto to Lovenox used over 10 days, and found the two medications equally effective.
The study was then extended to 35 days to compare long-term effectiveness. Some patients were given Xarelto for 35 days. Some were given Lovenox for 10 days, and then a placebo for the remaining 25 days.
Patients taking Xarelto had significantly higher rates of bleeding — they were more than twice as likely to experience bleeding compared to Lovenox. 4.1% of patients taking Xarelto experienced bleeding, compared to 1.7% taking Lovenox.
UK Agency Asks for More Xarelto Safety Data
Reuters reports on January 9, 2012 that Britain’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is asking Bayer to provide more safety data before it can recommend the drug for use in the state health services.
NICE said that the data Bayer had already provided was not sufficient to determine safety or efficacy of Xarelto. Because of the lack of data, the organization decided not to recommend the drug.
In November 2011, NICE approved the use of Pradaxa for stroke prevention after the company provided additional safety information. The organization also approved Eliquis, but only in patients who had recently undergone knee and hip replacement surgery.
Xarelto, Pradaxa, Eliquis, and Lixiana in a Race to Replace Warfarin and Dominate $20BN Market
The war over the multi-billion-dollar market for anti-stroke medications is heating up, as several major pharmaceutical companies push new drugs as alternatives to warfarin, a blood-thinning medication that has long dominated the stroke-prevention market. Warfarin is relatively inexpensive, but interacts with many foods and requires frequent blood testing to adjust the dosage.
The race for a safer, more user-friendly medication could potentially yield billions in profit. More than 2.2 million Americans and 4.5 million people in the European Union have atrial fibrillation, a type of irregular heartbeat that can cause blood clots that lead to stroke. The market for bloodthinners is estimated to be worth between $15-20 billion.
Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb, which released data in September 2011 that showed its drug, Eliquis (apixaban) caused less bleeding and fewer deaths than warfarin. Boehringer Ingelheim has already launched its drug Pradaxa (dabigatran) with an aggressive marketing campaign. Lixiana (edoxaban) is an oral anticoagulant drug in development by Daiichi Sankyo in Japan.
Xarelto Class Action Lawsuit Information
A number of people have already filed lawsuits, but these are not part of a Xarelto class action — they are individual legal claims filed by plaintiffs who have hired personal legal representation. The problem with a class action is that it can have disadvantages for people with severe injuries. However, it is possible that federal judges will establish a Multi-District Litigation (MDL) to centralize Xarelto lawsuits at the federal levels. Like a class action, an MDL streamlines litigation by allowing plaintiffs to share pre-trial discovery.
Do I have a Xarelto Lawsuit?
The Schmidt Firm, LLP is currently accepting Xarelto induced injury cases in all 50 states. If you or somebody you know has experienced a side effect after taking Xarelto, you should contact our lawyers immediately for a free case consultation. Please use the form below to contact our Defective Drug Litigation Group or call toll free 24 hours a day at (866) 920-0753.
Attention Lawyers: We consider a referral from another law firm to be one of the greatest compliments. If your firm is interested in referring us a case or for us to send you a list of previous award judgments and/or average referral fees, please visit the Lawyer Referral section of our website.
Free Case Evaluation
The Schmidt Firm, LLP has been recognized as one of the nation's leading plaintiff's law firms and handles cases in all 50 states. We are very proud of our legal achievements, but equally self-respecting of our firms reputation for providing personal attention to each and every client we represent.
No matter what type of case you have, you may contact us with confidence by filling out the email contact form below or calling us directly by dialing toll free 24 hrs/day (866) 920-0753.