Dr. Anita Rajasekhar, a hematologist from the University of Florida, and Dr. Joseph Stavas, professor of radiology at the University of North Carolina, debated the role of IVC filters in clinical practice.
Both doctors agreed that the devices pose serious risks, especially when retrievable filters are kept in place longer than necessary. According to Dr. Stavas, recent studies have shown that the retrieval rate is low — about 30% — and design improvements need to be made:
“Have we made progress since the Mobin-Uddin filter? Absolutely – that filter was practically a flying saucer held in the IVC with a string – but the evolution and innovation in IVC filter development is far from perfect.”
Despite growing evidence of long-term safety risks, the popularity of IVC filters has skyrocketed in the last 10 years. The problem is that guidelines about when to implant the devices vary widely. This has led to filters being implanted in patients when the risks clearly outweigh the benefits.
The doctors also expressed concern about a lack of studies showing that temporary IVC filters are actually effective at improving survival, with Dr. Stavas warning that “the evidence is all over the chart.” He said the devices were overhyped in the 1970s and “eventually became a crutch … providing a false sense of security.”
Do I have an IVC Filter Lawsuit?
The Schmidt Firm, PLLC is currently accepting IVC filter induced injury cases in all 50 states. If you or somebody you know has been diagnosed with a severe complication, you should contact our lawyers immediately for a free case consultation. Please use the form below to contact our Defective Medical Device Litigation Group or call toll free 24 hours a day at (866) 920-0753.
Attention Lawyers: We consider a referral from another law firm to be one of the greatest compliments. If your firm is interested in referring us a case or for us to send you a list of previous award judgments and/or average referral fees, please visit the Lawyer Referral section of our website.